The leap second’s time is up: world votes to stop pausing clocks
Raw Text
NEWS
18 November 2022
Elizabeth Gibney
Elizabeth Gibney View author publications You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
From 2035, no extra seconds will be added to bring clocks in sync with astronomical time. Credit: Adam Smigielski/Getty
The practice of adding ‘leap seconds’ to official clocks to keep them in sync with Earth’s rotation will be put on hold from 2035, the world’s foremost metrology body has decided.
The decision was made by representatives from governments worldwide at the General Conference on Weights and Measures (CGPM) outside Paris on 18 November. It means that from 2035, or possibly earlier, astronomical time (known as UT1) will be allowed to diverge by more than one second from coordinated universal time (UTC), which is based on the steady tick of atomic clocks. Since 1972, whenever the two time systems have drifted apart by more than 0.9 seconds, a leap second has been added.
How many yottabytes in a quettabyte? Extreme numbers get new names
Stopping the adjustments is “a leap forward” for researchers who work on time and frequency, says Georgette Macdonald, director general of the Metrology Research Centre in Halifax, Canada. “I’m pleased their efforts got us to this moment.”
Leap seconds aren’t predictable, because they depend on to Earth’s natural rotation. They disrupt systems based on precise timekeeping, Macdonald says, and can wreak havoc in the digital age. Facebook’s parent company, Meta, and Google are among the tech companies that have called for leap second s to be scrapped.
The CGPM — which also oversees the international system of units (SI) — has proposed that no leap second should be added for at least a century, allowing UT1 and UTC to slide out of sync by about 1 minute. But it plans to consult with other international organizations and decide by 2026 on what upper limit, if any, to put on how much they be allowed to diverge.
Time for change
Representatives from Canada, the United States and France were among those at the CGPM who called for the leap second to be scrapped before 2035. But Russia, which voted against the proposal, wants to push it back to 2040 or later to deal with technical issues within its satellite-navigation system, GLONASS.
The Russian system incorporates leap seconds, while the Global Position System (GPS) and others already effectively ignore them. The decision means that Russia might need to install new satellites and ground stations, says Felicitas Arias, former director of the Time Department at the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM) in Sèvres, France.
Astronomers who rely on UT1 to align their telescopes will also need to adjust, says Elizabeth Donley, who leads the Time and Frequency division at the National Institute of Standards and Technology, in Boulder, Colorado. But the current situation is unsustainable and would continue to get worse, she adds. Different organisations handle the leap second differently (Google, for example, smears out the extra second in the 24 hours around midnight UTC). This creates an ambiguity between time sources of as much as half a second, she says, “which is huge.”
Leap-second decision delayed by eight years
Although in the long term Earth’s rotation slows due to the pull of the Moon, a speed-up since 2020 has also made the issue more pressing, because for the first time, a leap second might need to be removed, rather than added. UTC has only ever had to slow a beat to wait for Earth, not skip ahead to catch up with it. “It's kind of being described as a Y2K issue, because it's just something that we've never had to deal with,” Donley says.
There is a chance that the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) could stymie plans to make the switch in 2035. The body effectively ceded decision making about the leap second to the CGPM in 2015 , and Arias says its working group agreed with the CGPM’s proposal. But the ITU remains in control of disseminating UTC, and could argue that the time is not right to make the change, she says. “This is the thing that makes us a little bit nervous.”
Subtle difference
Although human timepieces have been calibrated with Earth’s rotation for millennia, most people will feel little effect from the loss of the leap second. “In most countries, there is a one hour step between summertime and winter time,” says Arias. “It is much more than one second, but it doesn't affect you.”
Future metrologists might find more elegant ways than the leap second to realign UTC and UT1. At the point where the difference becomes significant, “our ability to reconcile it will be better than what our ability is right now”, says Macdonald.
Or they might not bother, Arias adds. When the difference becomes big enough, countries could permanently shift their legal time zone by one hour, she says. Or we could even decouple our sense of time from the Sun entirely, to create a single world time zone in which different countries see the Sun overhead at different times of day or night. “It could be a solution,” she says. “Science already doesn’t use local times, we talk in UTC.”
doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-03783-5
Related Articles
Leap-second decision delayed by eight years
Leap-second decision delayed by eight years
How many yottabytes in a quettabyte? Extreme numbers get new names
How many yottabytes in a quettabyte? Extreme numbers get new names
Subjects
Physics
Astronomy and astrophysics
Mathematics and computing
Latest on:
Regulating surface potential maximizes voltage in all-perovskite tandems
Article 15 NOV 22
Quantum field simulator for dynamics in curved spacetime
Article 09 NOV 22
Superfluid system hosts early-Universe dynamics
News & Views 09 NOV 22
JWST spots some of the most distant galaxies ever seen
News 17 NOV 22
Lift off! Artemis Moon rocket launch kicks off new era of human exploration
News 16 NOV 22
Private companies race to the Moon: Japan spacecraft set to take early lead
News 14 NOV 22
How many yottabytes in a quettabyte? Extreme numbers get new names
News 18 NOV 22
Using machine learning to assess the livelihood impact of electricity access
Article 16 NOV 22
Science and the World Cup: how big data is transforming football
News Feature 15 NOV 22
Jobs
Postdoctoral Fellow at Johns Hopkins University Johns Hopkins University (JHU) Baltimore, MD, United States
Postdoctoral Fellow at Johns Hopkins University
Johns Hopkins University (JHU)
Baltimore, MD, United States
Postdoctoral Fellow at Johns Hopkins University Johns Hopkins University (JHU) Baltimore, MD, United States
Postdoctoral Fellow at Johns Hopkins University
Johns Hopkins University (JHU)
Baltimore, MD, United States
Postdoctoral Fellowship in Breast Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (UT Southwestern Medical Center) Dallas, TX, United States
Postdoctoral Fellowship in Breast Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (UT Southwestern Medical Center)
Dallas, TX, United States
Murine Phenotyping Core / Staff Scientist NIH National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Bethesda, MD, United States
Murine Phenotyping Core / Staff Scientist
NIH National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Bethesda, MD, United States
Single Line Text
NEWS. 18 November 2022. Elizabeth Gibney. Elizabeth Gibney View author publications You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar. You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar. Twitter. Facebook. Email. From 2035, no extra seconds will be added to bring clocks in sync with astronomical time. Credit: Adam Smigielski/Getty. The practice of adding ‘leap seconds’ to official clocks to keep them in sync with Earth’s rotation will be put on hold from 2035, the world’s foremost metrology body has decided. The decision was made by representatives from governments worldwide at the General Conference on Weights and Measures (CGPM) outside Paris on 18 November. It means that from 2035, or possibly earlier, astronomical time (known as UT1) will be allowed to diverge by more than one second from coordinated universal time (UTC), which is based on the steady tick of atomic clocks. Since 1972, whenever the two time systems have drifted apart by more than 0.9 seconds, a leap second has been added. How many yottabytes in a quettabyte? Extreme numbers get new names. Stopping the adjustments is “a leap forward” for researchers who work on time and frequency, says Georgette Macdonald, director general of the Metrology Research Centre in Halifax, Canada. “I’m pleased their efforts got us to this moment.” Leap seconds aren’t predictable, because they depend on to Earth’s natural rotation. They disrupt systems based on precise timekeeping, Macdonald says, and can wreak havoc in the digital age. Facebook’s parent company, Meta, and Google are among the tech companies that have called for leap second s to be scrapped. The CGPM — which also oversees the international system of units (SI) — has proposed that no leap second should be added for at least a century, allowing UT1 and UTC to slide out of sync by about 1 minute. But it plans to consult with other international organizations and decide by 2026 on what upper limit, if any, to put on how much they be allowed to diverge. Time for change. Representatives from Canada, the United States and France were among those at the CGPM who called for the leap second to be scrapped before 2035. But Russia, which voted against the proposal, wants to push it back to 2040 or later to deal with technical issues within its satellite-navigation system, GLONASS. The Russian system incorporates leap seconds, while the Global Position System (GPS) and others already effectively ignore them. The decision means that Russia might need to install new satellites and ground stations, says Felicitas Arias, former director of the Time Department at the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM) in Sèvres, France. Astronomers who rely on UT1 to align their telescopes will also need to adjust, says Elizabeth Donley, who leads the Time and Frequency division at the National Institute of Standards and Technology, in Boulder, Colorado. But the current situation is unsustainable and would continue to get worse, she adds. Different organisations handle the leap second differently (Google, for example, smears out the extra second in the 24 hours around midnight UTC). This creates an ambiguity between time sources of as much as half a second, she says, “which is huge.” Leap-second decision delayed by eight years. Although in the long term Earth’s rotation slows due to the pull of the Moon, a speed-up since 2020 has also made the issue more pressing, because for the first time, a leap second might need to be removed, rather than added. UTC has only ever had to slow a beat to wait for Earth, not skip ahead to catch up with it. “It's kind of being described as a Y2K issue, because it's just something that we've never had to deal with,” Donley says. There is a chance that the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) could stymie plans to make the switch in 2035. The body effectively ceded decision making about the leap second to the CGPM in 2015 , and Arias says its working group agreed with the CGPM’s proposal. But the ITU remains in control of disseminating UTC, and could argue that the time is not right to make the change, she says. “This is the thing that makes us a little bit nervous.” Subtle difference. Although human timepieces have been calibrated with Earth’s rotation for millennia, most people will feel little effect from the loss of the leap second. “In most countries, there is a one hour step between summertime and winter time,” says Arias. “It is much more than one second, but it doesn't affect you.” Future metrologists might find more elegant ways than the leap second to realign UTC and UT1. At the point where the difference becomes significant, “our ability to reconcile it will be better than what our ability is right now”, says Macdonald. Or they might not bother, Arias adds. When the difference becomes big enough, countries could permanently shift their legal time zone by one hour, she says. Or we could even decouple our sense of time from the Sun entirely, to create a single world time zone in which different countries see the Sun overhead at different times of day or night. “It could be a solution,” she says. “Science already doesn’t use local times, we talk in UTC.” doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-03783-5. Related Articles. Leap-second decision delayed by eight years. Leap-second decision delayed by eight years. How many yottabytes in a quettabyte? Extreme numbers get new names. How many yottabytes in a quettabyte? Extreme numbers get new names. Subjects. Physics. Astronomy and astrophysics. Mathematics and computing. Latest on: Regulating surface potential maximizes voltage in all-perovskite tandems. Article 15 NOV 22. Quantum field simulator for dynamics in curved spacetime. Article 09 NOV 22. Superfluid system hosts early-Universe dynamics. News & Views 09 NOV 22. JWST spots some of the most distant galaxies ever seen. News 17 NOV 22. Lift off! Artemis Moon rocket launch kicks off new era of human exploration. News 16 NOV 22. Private companies race to the Moon: Japan spacecraft set to take early lead. News 14 NOV 22. How many yottabytes in a quettabyte? Extreme numbers get new names. News 18 NOV 22. Using machine learning to assess the livelihood impact of electricity access. Article 16 NOV 22. Science and the World Cup: how big data is transforming football. News Feature 15 NOV 22. Jobs. Postdoctoral Fellow at Johns Hopkins University Johns Hopkins University (JHU) Baltimore, MD, United States. Postdoctoral Fellow at Johns Hopkins University. Johns Hopkins University (JHU) Baltimore, MD, United States. Postdoctoral Fellow at Johns Hopkins University Johns Hopkins University (JHU) Baltimore, MD, United States. Postdoctoral Fellow at Johns Hopkins University. Johns Hopkins University (JHU) Baltimore, MD, United States. Postdoctoral Fellowship in Breast Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (UT Southwestern Medical Center) Dallas, TX, United States. Postdoctoral Fellowship in Breast Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy. The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (UT Southwestern Medical Center) Dallas, TX, United States. Murine Phenotyping Core / Staff Scientist NIH National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Bethesda, MD, United States. Murine Phenotyping Core / Staff Scientist. NIH National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Bethesda, MD, United States.