Our AI writing assistant, WriteUp, can assist you in easily writing any text. Click here to experience its capabilities.

EXCLUSIVE: Leaked admissions data gives glimpse into Harvard's affirmative action practices

View Original View Raw

Summary

The Post Millennial has obtained leaked admissions data from Harvard University, which reveals potentially discriminatory practices against Asian students in the graduate admissions process. The data shows that a hidden column identifies whether or not a student is a “Minority”, and that roughly two to three times as many spots were reserved for those with well-connected lobbying ties as it does for minorities. There were also comments about the admitted students, with the harshest comments reserved for the only two “Minority” admits. Harvard has declined to comment on the data. A recent graduate from Harvard commented that the campus environment encourages discriminatory practices in order to “virtue signal” for aggressive left-wing causes.

Q&As

What evidence does the article present to suggest that Harvard is discriminating against Asian students in admissions?
The article presents evidence that Harvard reserves two to three times as many spots for those with well-connected lobbying ties as it does for minorities, and none of the Asian applicants were tagged as “Minority”.

What is the definition of the term “Lobby” in the leaked admissions data?
It is unclear what the exact definition of “Lobby” is, but it may mean that someone on the faculty knows this particular person very well and is convinced he/she would do excellent work, or that this is some kind of donor connection, or some general "catch-all" category for nepotism.

What is the chairman of the Department of Economics' response to the leaked admissions data?
The chairman of the Department of Economics sent an email to the entire department asking everyone to do the right thing and leave the hidden columns hidden, and to not forward the spreadsheet to anyone else. He also sent a follow-up email asking all members of the economics department to permanently delete the email and any copies of the spreadsheet that were attached to it.

How do comments about the admitted PhD students reveal a double standard in Harvard admissions?
The comments about the admitted PhD students reveal a double standard in Harvard admissions, as the two harshest comments were reserved for the only two “Minority” admits who actually matriculated to Harvard. Both of them were Latino males, and one had a hidden comment next to his name that suggested he was not a good fit for the program, while the other had comments suggesting that his thesis work was not great and there was scant evidence of his research potential.

What incentives are present for Harvard to adopt discriminatory practices to benefit favored identity groups?
The incentives for Harvard to adopt discriminatory practices to benefit favored identity groups are to achieve more harmonious coexistence with the rest of the school, and to virtue signal for aggressive left wing causes.

AI Comments

👍 This article is a great example of investigative journalism that provides an important insight into Harvard's admissions process and the potential discrimination against Asian applicants.

👎 This article is biased and only presents one side of the story, ignoring Harvard's official stance and the other potential explanations for the discrepancies in admissions.

AI Discussion

Me: It's about Harvard's affirmative action practices. It suggests that Harvard is discriminating against Asian applicants by reserving spots for those with well-connected lobbying ties. It also suggests that "Minority" candidates get accepted despite negative reviews.

Friend: Wow, that's really concerning. It's a clear violation of equal opportunity and shows that the system is biased against people of color and other minority groups. It's also concerning that the university won't comment on the leaked data.

Me: Absolutely. It's also troubling that Harvard is refusing to be transparent about its admissions process and how it weighs factors such as race and connections when making decisions. This is a huge issue that needs to be addressed, and it's even more pressing that the Supreme Court is about to repeal affirmative action.

Action items

Research and learn more about affirmative action and its implications for college admissions.
Reach out to your local representatives and advocate for more transparency in college admissions processes.
Support independent media outlets that are dedicated to fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis.

Technical terms

Affirmative Action: A policy or program that seeks to redress past discrimination against certain groups, typically by taking active steps to improve the educational and employment opportunities of members of those groups.
Minority: A group that is smaller in number than the main group in a given population.
Lobby: An organized effort to influence public officials and policymakers on behalf of a special interest.
Matriculated: To be accepted into a college or university as a student.
Nepotism: The practice of giving jobs or other favors to relatives or friends, especially by those in power.
Virtue Signaling: The act of expressing opinions or sentiments intended to demonstrate one's good character or the moral correctness of one's position on a particular issue.