Making “Freemium” Work
Raw Text
Navigation Menu
Subscribe
Sign In
Search Menu
Close menu
CLEAR
SUGGESTED TOPICS
Explore HBR
Diversity
Latest
The Magazine
Ascend
Most Popular
Podcasts
Video
Store
Webinars
Newsletters
Popular Topics
Managing Yourself
Leadership
Strategy
Managing Teams
Gender
Innovation
Work-life Balance
All Topics
For Subscribers
The Big Idea
Data & Visuals
Reading Lists
Case Selections
HBR Learning
Subscribe
My Account
My Library
Topic Feeds
Orders
Account Settings
Email Preferences
Log Out
Sign In
Subscribe
Diversity
Latest
Podcasts
Video
The Magazine
Ascend
Store
Webinars
Newsletters
All Topics
The Big Idea
Data & Visuals
Reading Lists
Case Selections
HBR Learning
My Library
Account Settings
Log Out
Sign In
Your Cart
Visit Our Store
My Library
Topic Feeds
Orders
Account Settings
Email Preferences
Log Out
Reading Lists
1 free
s
last free article
Subscribe
Create an account
Pricing strategy
by
Vineet Kumar
by
Vineet Kumar
From the Magazine (May 2014)
Tweet
Post
Share
Annotate
Save
Get PDF
Buy Copies
Tweet
Post
Share
Annotate
Save
Get PDF
Buy Copies
Leer en espanol
Ler em portugues
Over the past decade “freemium”—a combination of “free” and “premium”—has become the dominant business model among internet start-ups and smartphone app developers. Users get basic features at no cost and can access richer functionality for a subscription fee. If you’ve networked on LinkedIn, shared files through Dropbox, watched TV shows through Hulu, or searched for a mate on Match, you’ve experienced the model firsthand. It works for B2B companies as well—examples include Box, Splunk, and Yammer.
Several factors contribute to the appeal of a freemium strategy. Because free features are a potent marketing tool, the model allows a new venture to scale up and attract a user base without expending resources on costly ad campaigns or a traditional sales force. The monthly subscription fees typically charged are proving to be a more sustainable source of revenue than the advertising model prevalent among online firms in the early 2000s. Social networks are powerful drivers: Many services offer incentives for referring friends (which is more appealing when the product is free). And freemium is more successful than 30-day free trials or other limited-term offers, because customers have become wary of cumbersome cancellation processes and find indefinite free access more compelling.
But despite its popularity and clear benefits, freemium is still poorly understood. It has inherent challenges, as demonstrated by the many start-ups that have tried but failed to make it work. For several years I have studied freemium models in depth—by coauthoring (with my HBS colleagues Bharat Anand, Sunil Gupta, and Felix Oberholzer-Gee) a case on the New York Times ’s paywall strategy (a variation of the freemium model); conducting a deep dive into the user data of a storage and synchronization company; and coauthoring (with my HBS colleagues Clarence Lee and Sunil Gupta) a working paper on how freemium companies can use referrals to spur usage and upgrades. Through this work I’ve come up with six questions that start-ups considering a freemium model should ask.
What should be free?
Let’s say you’ve created a digital product that has 20 features and you’ve chosen five that will be free to anyone who registers on your site. Users who want the other 15 will have to pay. How do you know whether you’ve made the right choices? And if you suspect that you haven’t, what should you do?
The Life Cycle of Upgrades
Freemium companies typically see the share of paid subscriptions (and therefore cash flow) rise and fall and then rise again in a predictable way over time. Those that don’t account for this phenomenon risk failure.
Recall that one of the chief purposes of freemium is to attract new users. If you’re not succeeding with that goal, it probably means that your free offerings are not compelling enough and you need to provide more or better features free. If you’re generating lots of traffic but few people are paying to upgrade, you may have the opposite problem: Your free offerings are too rich, and it’s time to cut back. This kind of tuning was evident at the New York Times website. After years of unrestricted access, in 2011 the paper began limiting users to 20 free articles a month; people had to subscribe if they wanted to read more. Over subsequent months the company realized it was still giving away too much and was getting too few subscribers as a result, so in 2012 it cut the number of free monthly articles to 10. Start-ups should expect to do similar tweaking to find the optimal balance between traffic and paying customers. The balancing act can be tricky: Users may revolt when asked to pay for things they are accustomed to getting free.
Do customers fully understand the premium offer?
Communicating two sets of benefits complicates your marketing efforts. If customers don’t clearly grasp what they would gain by upgrading, you will monetize fewer of them than you otherwise might.
Dropbox and LinkedIn are a study in contrasts. The former has attracted 200 million users with a simple proposition: Everyone who enters a username and a password gets two gigabytes of cloud-based storage free. If people run out of space, they can pay $9.99 a month (or, alternatively, $99 a year) for 100 GB of storage. The free version is adequate for basic documents, but anyone who wants to back up photos or other media quickly hits the limit, and the reasons to upgrade are obvious.
For many LinkedIn users, the advantages of upgrading are murkier. I’ve used LinkedIn for several years to keep in touch with colleagues, and I routinely receive e-mails urging me to upgrade—but the ongoing value of doing so is not apparent. (The company offers four premium subscriptions, some aimed at specific customer segments, such as recruiters or salespeople, and most featuring deeper search functionality, better e-mail capability, and more visibility into who has viewed your profile.) Although LinkedIn is successful—it was one of the first freemium companies to go public—it could probably monetize more users if the distinctions between its free and paid offerings were clearer.
What is your target conversion rate?
Imagine that you’re the CEO of a freemium start-up and you’re handed a report showing your conversion rate (the percentage of free users who have upgraded to a premium plan) for the most recent quarter. What figure do you hope to see?
A rate of 1% is probably too low, especially if you rely on subscription revenue alone. (Some players, including the New York Times and LinkedIn, also collect online ad revenue.) It signals either that too much of what you’re providing is free—giving users little reason to upgrade—or that consumers don’t understand or value your premium features.
But, less obviously, a very high conversion rate isn’t necessarily good. Remember that one of the benefits of a freemium model is the ability to generate traffic. Suppose that 50% of the users of your free product upgrade to premium. You might think that your model is working well; but perhaps your free product is not very compelling, which will limit your potential acquisitions. All other things being equal, you would do better to convert 5% of 2 million monthly visitors, for example, than to convert 50% of 100,000 visitors. The best long-term strategy is generally to aim for a moderate conversion rate (in my research, I’ve found that most companies’ range from 2% to 5%) coupled with a high volume of traffic. If you’re targeting a small market, you should aim for a higher rate.
Are you prepared for the conversion life cycle?
Let’s assume you’re attracting plenty of traffic and new users, and your conversion rate is 5%. You want to forecast growth and revenue. Can you simply draw a couple of straight lines, on the assumption that the rate will hold steady?
No. Early adopters are less price-sensitive than others, so they are more likely to upgrade. And often they are people for whom the value proposition is unusually compelling. (For instance, recruiters were early adopters of LinkedIn, because their business depends on their ability to identify and connect with professionals.) So over time, conversion rates typically dip as the user base expands to include people who are more price-sensitive or who see less value in the service. Although freemium companies universally have a very low marginal cost for each new user—otherwise the model wouldn’t make sense—those costs aren’t zero. At a minimum, free users put demands on server space and customer service.
How Four Companies Use the Model
Among the biggest decisions facing “freemium” businesses are which features to make free and how much to charge for the rest. Here’s a look at several approaches:
Companies that fail to understand these realities may feel a cash crunch as the number of free users grows and the cost of servicing them therefore rises. This is often the reason that companies launched with freemium models pivot away, converting to free time-limited trials or eliminating free offerings altogether. Start-ups that have recently made such a switch include LogMeIn, whose software provides remote access to PCs, and SugarSync, a cloud storage company that competes with Dropbox.
Are users becoming evangelists?
It’s important to recognize the full value of your free users, which takes two forms: Some of them become subscribers, and some draw in new members who become subscribers. In our HBS working paper and in ongoing research, we have found that a free user is typically worth 15% to 25% as much as a premium subscriber, with significant value stemming from referrals. We have also found that firms can increase the value of referrals by carefully managing referral incentives and communications. If you’re considering a freemium model, pay close attention to why and how satisfied users might help your product go viral.
Are you committed to ongoing innovation?
It’s a mistake to see freemium merely as a customer acquisition tool and to drop the free version when new customers stop coming in or when the upgrade rate dives. Users who join late are typically harder to convert; therefore, in order to keep increasing upgrades, you’ll need to keep increasing the value of your premium services. Smart companies view freemium not only as a revenue model but also as a commitment to innovation.
Dropbox is a good example. When it launched, in 2008, it was primarily a service for backing up files. It then began offering shared folders, making it a collaboration tool. Newer features allow for automatic syncing of smartphones and other devices and for automatic uploading of photos. Over time the user interface has improved as well. Each new feature has increased the value of the premium offering.
In today’s digital era, when the marginal costs of many products are dropping, businesses will increasingly turn to the freemium model. Across industries ranging from media (where companies are forced to rely less on advertising revenue and more on subscriber revenue) to education (where players may eventually seek to monetize mostly free online courses), the model is destined to grow more attractive. Companies can boost their odds of success by considering the six key questions above.
May 2014
Read more on Pricing strategy or related topics Marketing and Business models
VK Vineet Kumar is an assistant professor of marketing at Harvard Business School.
Tweet
Post
Share
Annotate
Save
Get PDF
Buy Copies
Read more on Pricing strategy or related topics Marketing and Business models
Partner Center
Diversity
Latest
Magazine
Ascend
Topics
Podcasts
Video
Store
The Big Idea
Data & Visuals
Case Selections
HBR Learning
Subscribe
Explore HBR
The Latest
Most Popular
All Topics
Magazine Archive
The Big Idea
Reading Lists
Case Selections
Video
Podcasts
Webinars
Data & Visuals
My Library
Newsletters
HBR Press
HBR Ascend
HBR Store
Article Reprints
Books
Cases
Collections
Magazine Issues
HBR Guide Series
HBR 20-Minute Managers
HBR Emotional Intelligence Series
HBR Must Reads
Tools
About HBR
Contact Us
Advertise with Us
Information for Booksellers/Retailers
Masthead
Global Editions
Media Inquiries
Guidelines for Authors
HBR Analytic Services
Copyright Permissions
Manage My Account
My Library
Topic Feeds
Orders
Account Settings
Email Preferences
Account FAQ
Help Center
Contact Customer Service
Follow HBR
Your Newsreader
About Us
Careers
Privacy Policy
Cookie Policy
Copyright Information
Trademark Policy
Higher Education
Corporate Learning
Harvard Business Review
Harvard Business School
Single Line Text
Navigation Menu. Subscribe. Sign In. Search Menu. Close menu. CLEAR. SUGGESTED TOPICS. Explore HBR. Diversity. Latest. The Magazine. Ascend. Most Popular. Podcasts. Video. Store. Webinars. Newsletters. Popular Topics. Managing Yourself. Leadership. Strategy. Managing Teams. Gender. Innovation. Work-life Balance. All Topics. For Subscribers. The Big Idea. Data & Visuals. Reading Lists. Case Selections. HBR Learning. Subscribe. My Account. My Library. Topic Feeds. Orders. Account Settings. Email Preferences. Log Out. Sign In. Subscribe. Diversity. Latest. Podcasts. Video. The Magazine. Ascend. Store. Webinars. Newsletters. All Topics. The Big Idea. Data & Visuals. Reading Lists. Case Selections. HBR Learning. My Library. Account Settings. Log Out. Sign In. Your Cart. Visit Our Store. My Library. Topic Feeds. Orders. Account Settings. Email Preferences. Log Out. Reading Lists. 1 free. s. last free article. Subscribe. Create an account. Pricing strategy. by. Vineet Kumar. by. Vineet Kumar. From the Magazine (May 2014) Tweet. Post. Share. Annotate. Save. Get PDF. Buy Copies. Print. Tweet. Post. Share. Annotate. Save. Get PDF. Buy Copies. Print. Leer en espanol. Ler em portugues. Over the past decade “freemium”—a combination of “free” and “premium”—has become the dominant business model among internet start-ups and smartphone app developers. Users get basic features at no cost and can access richer functionality for a subscription fee. If you’ve networked on LinkedIn, shared files through Dropbox, watched TV shows through Hulu, or searched for a mate on Match, you’ve experienced the model firsthand. It works for B2B companies as well—examples include Box, Splunk, and Yammer. Several factors contribute to the appeal of a freemium strategy. Because free features are a potent marketing tool, the model allows a new venture to scale up and attract a user base without expending resources on costly ad campaigns or a traditional sales force. The monthly subscription fees typically charged are proving to be a more sustainable source of revenue than the advertising model prevalent among online firms in the early 2000s. Social networks are powerful drivers: Many services offer incentives for referring friends (which is more appealing when the product is free). And freemium is more successful than 30-day free trials or other limited-term offers, because customers have become wary of cumbersome cancellation processes and find indefinite free access more compelling. But despite its popularity and clear benefits, freemium is still poorly understood. It has inherent challenges, as demonstrated by the many start-ups that have tried but failed to make it work. For several years I have studied freemium models in depth—by coauthoring (with my HBS colleagues Bharat Anand, Sunil Gupta, and Felix Oberholzer-Gee) a case on the New York Times ’s paywall strategy (a variation of the freemium model); conducting a deep dive into the user data of a storage and synchronization company; and coauthoring (with my HBS colleagues Clarence Lee and Sunil Gupta) a working paper on how freemium companies can use referrals to spur usage and upgrades. Through this work I’ve come up with six questions that start-ups considering a freemium model should ask. What should be free? Let’s say you’ve created a digital product that has 20 features and you’ve chosen five that will be free to anyone who registers on your site. Users who want the other 15 will have to pay. How do you know whether you’ve made the right choices? And if you suspect that you haven’t, what should you do? The Life Cycle of Upgrades. Freemium companies typically see the share of paid subscriptions (and therefore cash flow) rise and fall and then rise again in a predictable way over time. Those that don’t account for this phenomenon risk failure. Recall that one of the chief purposes of freemium is to attract new users. If you’re not succeeding with that goal, it probably means that your free offerings are not compelling enough and you need to provide more or better features free. If you’re generating lots of traffic but few people are paying to upgrade, you may have the opposite problem: Your free offerings are too rich, and it’s time to cut back. This kind of tuning was evident at the New York Times website. After years of unrestricted access, in 2011 the paper began limiting users to 20 free articles a month; people had to subscribe if they wanted to read more. Over subsequent months the company realized it was still giving away too much and was getting too few subscribers as a result, so in 2012 it cut the number of free monthly articles to 10. Start-ups should expect to do similar tweaking to find the optimal balance between traffic and paying customers. The balancing act can be tricky: Users may revolt when asked to pay for things they are accustomed to getting free. Do customers fully understand the premium offer? Communicating two sets of benefits complicates your marketing efforts. If customers don’t clearly grasp what they would gain by upgrading, you will monetize fewer of them than you otherwise might. Dropbox and LinkedIn are a study in contrasts. The former has attracted 200 million users with a simple proposition: Everyone who enters a username and a password gets two gigabytes of cloud-based storage free. If people run out of space, they can pay $9.99 a month (or, alternatively, $99 a year) for 100 GB of storage. The free version is adequate for basic documents, but anyone who wants to back up photos or other media quickly hits the limit, and the reasons to upgrade are obvious. For many LinkedIn users, the advantages of upgrading are murkier. I’ve used LinkedIn for several years to keep in touch with colleagues, and I routinely receive e-mails urging me to upgrade—but the ongoing value of doing so is not apparent. (The company offers four premium subscriptions, some aimed at specific customer segments, such as recruiters or salespeople, and most featuring deeper search functionality, better e-mail capability, and more visibility into who has viewed your profile.) Although LinkedIn is successful—it was one of the first freemium companies to go public—it could probably monetize more users if the distinctions between its free and paid offerings were clearer. What is your target conversion rate? Imagine that you’re the CEO of a freemium start-up and you’re handed a report showing your conversion rate (the percentage of free users who have upgraded to a premium plan) for the most recent quarter. What figure do you hope to see? A rate of 1% is probably too low, especially if you rely on subscription revenue alone. (Some players, including the New York Times and LinkedIn, also collect online ad revenue.) It signals either that too much of what you’re providing is free—giving users little reason to upgrade—or that consumers don’t understand or value your premium features. But, less obviously, a very high conversion rate isn’t necessarily good. Remember that one of the benefits of a freemium model is the ability to generate traffic. Suppose that 50% of the users of your free product upgrade to premium. You might think that your model is working well; but perhaps your free product is not very compelling, which will limit your potential acquisitions. All other things being equal, you would do better to convert 5% of 2 million monthly visitors, for example, than to convert 50% of 100,000 visitors. The best long-term strategy is generally to aim for a moderate conversion rate (in my research, I’ve found that most companies’ range from 2% to 5%) coupled with a high volume of traffic. If you’re targeting a small market, you should aim for a higher rate. Are you prepared for the conversion life cycle? Let’s assume you’re attracting plenty of traffic and new users, and your conversion rate is 5%. You want to forecast growth and revenue. Can you simply draw a couple of straight lines, on the assumption that the rate will hold steady? No. Early adopters are less price-sensitive than others, so they are more likely to upgrade. And often they are people for whom the value proposition is unusually compelling. (For instance, recruiters were early adopters of LinkedIn, because their business depends on their ability to identify and connect with professionals.) So over time, conversion rates typically dip as the user base expands to include people who are more price-sensitive or who see less value in the service. Although freemium companies universally have a very low marginal cost for each new user—otherwise the model wouldn’t make sense—those costs aren’t zero. At a minimum, free users put demands on server space and customer service. How Four Companies Use the Model. Among the biggest decisions facing “freemium” businesses are which features to make free and how much to charge for the rest. Here’s a look at several approaches: Companies that fail to understand these realities may feel a cash crunch as the number of free users grows and the cost of servicing them therefore rises. This is often the reason that companies launched with freemium models pivot away, converting to free time-limited trials or eliminating free offerings altogether. Start-ups that have recently made such a switch include LogMeIn, whose software provides remote access to PCs, and SugarSync, a cloud storage company that competes with Dropbox. Are users becoming evangelists? It’s important to recognize the full value of your free users, which takes two forms: Some of them become subscribers, and some draw in new members who become subscribers. In our HBS working paper and in ongoing research, we have found that a free user is typically worth 15% to 25% as much as a premium subscriber, with significant value stemming from referrals. We have also found that firms can increase the value of referrals by carefully managing referral incentives and communications. If you’re considering a freemium model, pay close attention to why and how satisfied users might help your product go viral. Are you committed to ongoing innovation? It’s a mistake to see freemium merely as a customer acquisition tool and to drop the free version when new customers stop coming in or when the upgrade rate dives. Users who join late are typically harder to convert; therefore, in order to keep increasing upgrades, you’ll need to keep increasing the value of your premium services. Smart companies view freemium not only as a revenue model but also as a commitment to innovation. Dropbox is a good example. When it launched, in 2008, it was primarily a service for backing up files. It then began offering shared folders, making it a collaboration tool. Newer features allow for automatic syncing of smartphones and other devices and for automatic uploading of photos. Over time the user interface has improved as well. Each new feature has increased the value of the premium offering. In today’s digital era, when the marginal costs of many products are dropping, businesses will increasingly turn to the freemium model. Across industries ranging from media (where companies are forced to rely less on advertising revenue and more on subscriber revenue) to education (where players may eventually seek to monetize mostly free online courses), the model is destined to grow more attractive. Companies can boost their odds of success by considering the six key questions above. May 2014. Read more on Pricing strategy or related topics Marketing and Business models. VK Vineet Kumar is an assistant professor of marketing at Harvard Business School. Tweet. Post. Share. Annotate. Save. Get PDF. Buy Copies. Print. Read more on Pricing strategy or related topics Marketing and Business models. Partner Center. Diversity. Latest. Magazine. Ascend. Topics. Podcasts. Video. Store. The Big Idea. Data & Visuals. Case Selections. HBR Learning. Subscribe. Explore HBR. The Latest. Most Popular. All Topics. Magazine Archive. The Big Idea. Reading Lists. Case Selections. Video. Podcasts. Webinars. Data & Visuals. My Library. Newsletters. HBR Press. HBR Ascend. HBR Store. Article Reprints. Books. Cases. Collections. Magazine Issues. HBR Guide Series. HBR 20-Minute Managers. HBR Emotional Intelligence Series. HBR Must Reads. Tools. About HBR. Contact Us. Advertise with Us. Information for Booksellers/Retailers. Masthead. Global Editions. Media Inquiries. Guidelines for Authors. HBR Analytic Services. Copyright Permissions. Manage My Account. My Library. Topic Feeds. Orders. Account Settings. Email Preferences. Account FAQ. Help Center. Contact Customer Service. Follow HBR. Facebook. Twitter. LinkedIn. Instagram. Your Newsreader. About Us. Careers. Privacy Policy. Cookie Policy. Copyright Information. Trademark Policy. Higher Education. Corporate Learning. Harvard Business Review. Harvard Business School.